No Parking, No Car — A Rule with Good Intentions, But Is the Ground Ready?


No Parking, No Car

Maharashtra’s proposed “No Parking, No Car” policy may sound like a logical step to reduce congestion—but let’s pause and look at how this plays out for everyday homebuyers.

Here’s what the ground reality looks like:

1. The parking-to-apartment ratio is broken.

  • In affordable housing, the parking ratio is generally  0.3 to 0.5 — meaning only 3-5 parking spots for every 10 flats.
  • In mid-income housing, it’s slightly better — around 0.7 to 1 — still not even one space per family.
  • So even if a buyer wants to follow the rule, has the money, and is willing to pay, parking may simply not be available.

2. Will this apply to existing societies too?

  • Most older buildings weren’t designed for today’s car ownership levels.
  • They have no space left to create new parking—how will they comply?
  • How will these communities comply?

3. Current public transport isn’t a viable alternative.

  • Let’s be honest , public transport isn’t efficient, reliable, or safe enough to replace personal vehicles—especially for families, senior citizens

4. What’s the government doing to incentivize builders?

  • Instead of mandating parking as a part of basic building norms, this rule shifts responsibility to homebuyers.
  • There’s no structured incentive for builders to increase parking, and no disincentive if they don’t.
  • Before enforcing new restrictions, why not first reform the supply side?

5. Will builders exploit this?

  • Absolutely a risk. Builders may hike parking prices as a way to generate extra profits, knowing buyers will be desperate to comply.

My view:

Rules like “No Parking, No Car” may have good intentions—but if not backed by system-level preparedness, they often cause more confusion, non-compliance, and corruption.

People will find unethical ways to “prove” they have parking.
False affidavits, fake approvals, and under-the-table deals will rise—not because buyers are dishonest, but because the system forces them into a corner.

Instead, the government should:

  • Fix parking norms at the construction approval stage.
  • Incentivize additional parking creation.
  • Strengthen public transport before restricting private movement.

Take input from all stakeholders—buyers, RWAs, builders—before passing blanket rules.

Without that, we’re setting ourselves up for rule-breaking—not rule-following.

What are your thoughts on this policy?

Let’s build smarter cities—but let’s do it with full context.

Article written by Ankit Agarwal, CEO and Founder of Housiey.

Maharashtra’s proposed “No Parking, No Car” policy may sound like a logical step to reduce congestion—but let’s pause and look at how this plays out for everyday homebuyers.

Here’s what the ground reality looks like:

1. The parking-to-apartment ratio is broken.

  • In affordable housing, the parking ratio is generally  0.3 to 0.5 — meaning only 3-5 parking spots for every 10 flats.
  • In mid-income housing, it’s slightly better — around 0.7 to 1 — still not even one space per family.
  • So even if a buyer wants to follow the rule, has the money, and is willing to pay, parking may simply not be available.

2. Will this apply to existing societies too?

  • Most older buildings weren’t designed for today’s car ownership levels.
  • They have no space left to create new parking—how will they comply?
  • How will these communities comply?

3. Current public transport isn’t a viable alternative.

  • Let’s be honest , public transport isn’t efficient, reliable, or safe enough to replace personal vehicles—especially for families, senior citizens

4. What’s the government doing to incentivize builders?

  • Instead of mandating parking as a part of basic building norms, this rule shifts responsibility to homebuyers.
  • There’s no structured incentive for builders to increase parking, and no disincentive if they don’t.
  • Before enforcing new restrictions, why not first reform the supply side?

5. Will builders exploit this?

  • Absolutely a risk. Builders may hike parking prices as a way to generate extra profits, knowing buyers will be desperate to comply.

My view:

Rules like “No Parking, No Car” may have good intentions—but if not backed by system-level preparedness, they often cause more confusion, non-compliance, and corruption.

People will find unethical ways to “prove” they have parking.
False affidavits, fake approvals, and under-the-table deals will rise—not because buyers are dishonest, but because the system forces them into a corner.

Instead, the government should:

  • Fix parking norms at the construction approval stage.
  • Incentivize additional parking creation.
  • Strengthen public transport before restricting private movement.

Take input from all stakeholders—buyers, RWAs, builders—before passing blanket rules.

Without that, we’re setting ourselves up for rule-breaking—not rule-following.

What are your thoughts on this policy?

Let’s build smarter cities—but let’s do it with full context.

Article written by Ankit Agarwal, CEO and Founder of Housiey.